DJI Osmo Pocket 4 Pro Just Launched Shop now →

DJI Dock 4 vs Dock 3

Drone Safe Store October 14th, 2026
DJI Dock 4 vs Dock 3

The Spec Comparison at a Glance

Spec

Dock 4

Dock 3

Compatible aircraft

Matrice 5TD

Matrice 4D, Matrice 4TD

Total weight

66kg (batteries and aircraft not included)

55kg (aircraft not included)

Dimensions, cover open (L×W×H)

1750×640×550mm

1760×745×485mm

Dimensions, cover closed (L×W×H)

639×640×836mm

640×745×770mm

Input power

Up to 2,000W

Up to 800W

Operating temperature

-40°C to 50°C

-30°C to 50°C

IP rating

IP56

IP56

Max landing wind speed

12 m/s

12 m/s

Max operating altitude

5000m

4500m

Charging method

Battery swap + wireless backup

Wireless charging

Battery swap time

Under 25 seconds

Not supported

Operational turnaround

Under 45 seconds

Not supported

Charging time (15% to 95%)

27 minutes

27 minutes

Max batteries held

3, across 4 compartments

Built-in only

RTK base station

Via DJI O4 Ground Station

Built into the dock

Video transmission

DJI O4 Enterprise Enhanced

DJI O4+ Enterprise

Battery-Swap Charging Replaces the Wait

A swap triggers only when the difference between the depleted battery and the highest-charged one exceeds 10% and that highest battery sits above 90%, timed to the aircraft landing, before a scheduled operation starts, or an hour ahead of an automated mission. Dock 3 has no equivalent, every aircraft charges in place on a 27-minute cycle regardless of how the dock is deployed. Dock 4 holds three batteries across four compartments and charges two from separate sets simultaneously, so the swap stock replenishes in the background between flights rather than tying up the only charging slot.

Battery-Swap Charging Replaces the Wait
RTK Has Moved to the O4 Ground Station

RTK Has Moved to the O4 Ground Station

Dock 3 carries its RTK base station built into the dock housing itself. Dock 4 moves that function out to a separate DJI O4 Ground Station, extending transmission range to 40km and running four connection modes, including a roaming mode that adds a second O4 to extend coverage without the dock needing to sit inside direct range. This is an architecture change rather than a feature removed, and it adds a physical component to the installation a Dock 3 site doesn't need to plan for.

Power and Installation Requirements Have Grown

Dock 4 needs up to 2,000W of input power against Dock 3's 800W, a real factor on a site where the existing circuit was sized for the older dock. The power cable connector has also changed (LP25 against Dock 3's LP20), so Dock 3 power cabling isn't compatible with a Dock 4 installation even where the physical mounting base is reused. Total unit weight runs higher too, 66kg against 55kg, before batteries or the aircraft are factored in.

Environmental Tolerance Favours the Dock 4

Operating temperature extends to -40°C against Dock 3's -30°C, and maximum operating altitude rises to 5000m against 4500m. Both docks hold the same IP56 rating and the same 12 m/s maximum landing wind speed, so the gap is specifically about cold-weather and high-altitude deployment rather than weatherproofing generally.

Environmental Tolerance Favours the Dock 4

Aircraft Pairing Is Not Interchangeable

Dock 4 pairs exclusively with the Matrice 5TD, which carries 59 minutes of maximum flight time against the Matrice 4TD's 54, a thermal camera at double the native resolution, and a parachute fitted as standard on the UK and EU airframe. Moving from a Dock 3 setup to a Dock 4 setup means buying the new dock and the Matrice 5TD together, not adding a payload or a firmware update to existing hardware.

What Actually Changes Between the Two

The swap-versus-charge difference matters most on a high-tempo deployment, repeat perimeter patrol, first-responder dispatch or multi-sortie corridor inspection, where a 27-minute wait between flights is the limiting factor. A site with lower available input power, or one that's already invested in Dock 3 and Matrice 4TD hardware with no need for faster turnaround, has no obligation to move. The decision sits on operational tempo and site electrical capacity more than on any single spec in isolation.

Share this post

More articles

Accreditation